Thursday, October 30, 2008

Two Cultures

No, not C.P. Snow's two cultures of the sciences and humanities, or the red state/blue state stuff occupying so much of the atomic world's attention, but the two cultures that Linden Lab sees as fundamentally incompatible, though they mostly aren't: the enterprise and the citizen.

Not in the foreground, but in the background of everything Linden Lab does, from Mitch Kapor's statements to its technical agenda to its craptastic customer service, lies one consistent notion: the enterprise and the citizen are cultural enemies, and Linden Lab desperately, pathetically, embarrassingly, wants to be thought of as being in the enterprise camp.

Now, if you asked the Resident-citizen-creators of SL's world, and its most active enterprise users, they'd overwhelmingly say there's little tension, let alone a cultural war. But the Lindens act as if the bullets are flying.

Why? Because Linden Lab is staffed (not exclusively, but throughout key positions) by oreos, bananas, Uncle Toms, אוטואנטישמיות, self-hating geeks. The Lindens want to be Serious Business People. They do not want to go to cocktail parties in San Francisco and be laughed at as flying-penis furry genderbending kiddie-porn-viewing freaks, losers and perverts.

That right there? That explains every major corporate action and choice out of Linden Lab in the past year and a half or so (my lifetime in SL - I understand from Hamlet Au things were different once).

Now, nothing's more natural for a minority group to set up a hierarchy of internal discrimination, usually based on ability to pass for a member of the majority. Geeks are no exception:



So, Lindens are geeks. True facts, sorry guys, that's just how it is. They're geeks. Mundanes, muggles, straights - they don't build and (sorta) maintain virtual worlds. We citizen-Residents are geeks. Enterprise users are geeks. Maybe a good chunk of the user base, the group whose employers aren't in SL and who aren't among Gwyneth Llewellyn's Hundred Thousand citizen-creators, really are straights. But Lindens? Sorry, not a chance.

And geeks? We're still a pretty disliked minority:

So people are rejecting the scifi label not because of science, but because of the fiction. Science has become a part of everybody's pop culture, but science fiction hasn't. And by extension, the people who like science fiction haven't. The nerds at Comic-Con, the dorks at the comic book store, and the dweebs who wish Borders carried more scifi are not the kinds of people that marketers want associated with their cultural products.


There you have it, the cultural imperative that leads Lindens to hate themselves. Now, hating yourself is pretty rough - it's hard to escape yourself, and all that.

(this is really Botgirl's territory, and *our* two cultures have a cease-fire: I don't do psychology, and she doesn't do sociology. This here is just a minor cross-border hot pursuit incident :P )

So what can you do if you think you're kind of disgusting and shameful? Project.

Project all that contempt and loathing onto others. That's where the Geek Hierarchy comes in: "me? I'm really straight - I just have this one little, well, I'd hardly even call it a *kink,* more a gentle curve, really. Them over there, those dirty perverts? Now *they're* kinky..."

The Lindens are geeks. They've internalized the mainstream view that geeks are shameful, so they're ashamed at being associated with a geeky product. In response - they dissociate themselves. They distance themselves from the social deviants and ally themselves with the most legitimate group around: Serious Big Business.

They look for any opportunity to show they're not on our side but the other side, and those opportunities manifest as the worst sort of extreme bigotry against their own kind: Philip suggests we have too much time on our hands, Robin says we're not worthy of trust, and on. The Lindens behave like caricatures of the other culture in a pathetic attempt to "pass" - it's surprising their avatars don't all wear top hats and smoke cigars.

The thing is? The Lindens' public psychodrama is destroying their business. Grace McDunnough compares them to John Sutter, who went bust at ground zero of a gold rush because he rejected new business opportunities in favor of old ways that had passed. Dale Innis generously (and accurately) ascribes Linden policy flailing to a failure to manage internal communications. Zoe Connolly, in one of a series of incisive posts, describes LL's attitude:

I think the new people in charge of LL care little or nothing about hobbyists and social networkers on the grid. I wonder if they would rather see a grid community full of corporate reps and tech journalists chatting endlessly about server capacities and new ways to increase usage of virtual worlds. Well duh! LL seeks to destroy the very things that bring a wide range of people into virtual worlds in the first place! If that's what you really want, use a video-phone and chat with each other all frakking day. Roleplayers of any type/degree are in the way of their vision. I believe they may be thinking "If you care so much about your little RP/hobby, then put-up or shut-up"


Finally, Nightflower, in a spectacularly brilliant post, explains why they can get away with both incompetence and bigotry.

They're all right, and what it adds up to is Linden Lab systematically tearing down their own business.

There's a culture war indeed. But that war isn't between enterprise users and the Hundred Thousand. It's within the blackened little corporate soul of Linden Lab. It's a war on their own inner geek, and if they win, they lose. And so do we all.

9 comments:

Alberik Rotaru said...

Brilliant post. I've always been amazed by the language of Lindenismo, how tortured, how verbose, how meaningless. At one time I thought it was just a way of using many words to communicate nothing. Your thinking offers an explanation.

In the pursuit of corp cred they use words they think a good little bureaucrat in a 'real' enterprise uses.

The world's newest branch of fandom, the corpfan. I would speculate about the naked posters of Greenspan, Trump and Murdoch they put up to decorate their cube farm, but the image scares me.

Dale Innis said...

Oooh, that is deeply insightful! One of those things that's funny just because it's so clearly true. How can we help the Lindens recapture the proper pride in their weirdo-geek natures, and free them from their corporate-o-phile self-hatred?

Galatea Gynoid said...

The only thing I can note is the complete absence of any such attitude from any actual Linden I've ever met and talked to. Of course, I don't go to press-release events, just the occasional office hours, or just happening across one on the grid.

I'm not unfamiliar with the attitude, mind you. I see it described continually on blogs. I think all the bloggers know a Linden I don't. His name is Straw Linden. Straw Linden wants all us weirdos off the grid, so that the sanitized world is safe for his corporate friends, and he'll do anything to drive us off.

Funny thing is, my alt has been running a kink-related business for a couple years now, and Straw Linden has never showed up and tried to shut me down. The Lindens have never done anything to try to make me feel unwelcome. Sure, they don't invite me to their media showcase events, but I never expected they would. I can understand why they wouldn't, and I don't have a problem with that. Not inviting someone to your party is a far cry from trying to drive them out of town.

The fictional Straw Linden is constantly making public statements saying they want us gone, all gone, gone now, but no real Linden has ever said anything of the sort that I've ever seen. There's a widespread public perception that they have, but I give about as much credence to the supposed attitude of Straw Linden as I do to the viewpoints of the fictional, Islamic Barrack Obama who exists in the conservative blogosphere, but nowhere in real life. Certain fictional people aren't worth wasting time thinking about.

As for the real Lindens I do know, they all seem quite proud of their geek-cred.

Maybe I just know the wrong Lindens. If Straw Linden actually exists, though, he's doing a good job of hiding. I see people talking about him on the blogs all the bloody time, but I have yet to encounter him. Perhaps that's just as well. He can survive in the blogosphere. I mostly avoid the blogosphere these days anyway, in part because almost every discussion I see in it, even ones supposedly about SL, never seem to be talking about the SL I live in. The SL they describe is one that would have driven me out of business and off the grid ages ago. And yet, I'm still here, surviving, even thriving these days.

It's a dim fantasy world these people describe. I'm glad I don't have to live in it.

See you on the Grid... ;)

Peter Stindberg said...

I'm a geek and I'm proud of it. I am part of the first generation to grow up with computers, had my Commodre 64 aged 16, had my first internet access in 1989. I developed my first website in 1996 and it is still online. I am proud to have been - and be - part of a culture that shapes our world, that opens possibilities beyond ourimaginations. That does not mean though that I am blind to risk, and trust and believe blindly in technology as the sole way to go. I try to eat organic, to chose climate neutral options, I trust into some so called "alternative" medicine (which in fact is proven medicine longer than our modern technology exists).

And, besides, geeks are the better lovers ;-)

Sophrosyne Stenvaag said...

@alberik and Dale - thank you!

@Gala - what held me up from making this post a couple weeks ago was my lack of hard evidence, which you rightly raised.

That said, I don't think there *is* an absence of evidence. In my next post I'm going to show what I've got, and call on the community to document an LL anti-geek attitude.

If we can't deliver the evidence from actual public Linden statements, I'll publicly grovel.

However, what I expect will happen is that we'll continue to disagree: you'll say it's neither sufficient nor proof

(as I don't expect anyone will find that seekrit link to http://secondlife.com/banallthegeeks.pdf),

and I'll say it's the sort of nudge nudge wink wink behavior from on high that plausibly-deniably encourages crazy actions, a la the political campaign you mentioned.

That's okay - I think we're a stronger partnership and business for seeing things from different perspectives.

alberik rotaru said...

Everyone should read the DNOS theory for Second Life's fast degrading performance. What a sad joke that it's entirely possible that the Lindens, Second Life's own ex-geek ministry, are so busy trying on the Prada that they have forgotten to fix the platform.

Dale Innis said...

Gala's comment is very good, I think! When the actual Lindens who talk to us do so one-to-one, they are cool and nice geeky people. It's when they make statements that have been through the legal department (in the blog) or when they feel constrained by What People Might Think (as in some office hours) that they come off as having tie-envy. Have to think about this point more... :)

Sophrosyne Stenvaag said...

@Dale - I think that's right, and gets into some really interesting stuff on how corporate culture comes to be. I wish I knew more!

slhamlet said...

Soph, have you been to an actual San Francisco cocktail party before? I'm guessing you haven't. The kind that the Lindens attend generally involve people Twittering their every activity, showing the latest LOLcat or FAIL pic on their iPhone, and uploading party photos to a Flickr page. In other words, they are geek through and through. The notion that the Lindens are uncomfortable with their geekiness doesn't track to the reality and culture of the Internet/tech industry, especially in the Bay Area. Here, the geeks have most of the money, most of the fame, and almost all of the social status. Why do you think the Lindens would feel geek self-hatred in a milieu and an industry where Robert Scoble, Jimmy Wales, and Will Wright are considered rockstars?